Dixi quod…
>>I’ll recompile with re-enabled alignment on the missing base
>
>Seems to be only one.
>
>--- src/hotspot/share/memory/allocation.hpp~ 2024-04-12 23:52:54.0
>+
>+++ src/hotspot/share/memory/allocation.hpp2024-04-12 23:52:56.0
>+
>@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
Dixi quod…
>I’ll recompile with re-enabled alignment on the missing base
Seems to be only one.
--- src/hotspot/share/memory/allocation.hpp~2024-04-12 23:52:54.0
+
+++ src/hotspot/share/memory/allocation.hpp 2024-04-12 23:52:56.0
+
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ class
Dixi quod…
>>(This is what I found trying to build openjdk-20, but it’ll be
>>needed in 21 as well. Even getting to this point took 13½ days
>>already…)
>
>And turns out that this isn’t the cause.
>
>In 17, we’ve got src/hotspot/share/memory/allocation.hpp to
>align all CHeapObj, StackObj,
Dixi quod…
>(This is what I found trying to build openjdk-20, but it’ll be
>needed in 21 as well. Even getting to this point took 13½ days
>already…)
And turns out that this isn’t the cause.
In 17, we’ve got src/hotspot/share/memory/allocation.hpp to
align all CHeapObj, StackObj, MetaspaceObj,
Source: openjdk-21
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de, debian-...@lists.debian.org
Please add the following patch e.g. to debian/patches/m68k-support.diff
for more making implicit alignment assumptions (here by the futex
syscall) explicit:
--- src/hotspot/os/linux/waitBarrier_linux.hpp~ 2024-04-12
5 matches
Mail list logo
