On 20/04/24 at 15:39 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 20.04.2024 15:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> [..]
> > This is part of a mass rebuild, first building on arm64 and then on
> > armhf and armel. So I'm not suggesting anything. :-)
>
> Aha.
>
> > Is this failing because the build is trying to build
20.04.2024 15:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[..]
This is part of a mass rebuild, first building on arm64 and then on
armhf and armel. So I'm not suggesting anything. :-)
Aha.
Is this failing because the build is trying to build arch:all packages,
that can only be built on amd64? If so, the bug
On 20/04/24 at 15:27 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
> Control: found -1 1:4.2-2
>
> 20.04.2024 15:11, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: qemu
> > Version: 1:8.2.2+ds-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian.org
>
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: found -1 1:4.2-2
20.04.2024 15:11, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: qemu
Version: 1:8.2.2+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Source: qemu
Version: 1:8.2.2+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
5 matches
Mail list logo