Bug#1071979: pinot: FTBFS with exiv2 0.28

2024-07-29 Thread Olly Betts
Hi Pino, On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 07:49:36AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > I got tickets for all of them filed now, and I'll likely open a > transition request with release-team later this week. Hence, if you > would please fix pinot in the meanwhile, that will certainly help :) I've been trying,

Bug#1071979: pinot: FTBFS with exiv2 0.28

2024-07-22 Thread Pino Toscano
Source: pinot Followup-For: Bug #1071979 Hi Olly, sorry for the late answer. I'm left now with only a handful of sources that still do not build with Exiv2 0.28+: 5 in total (pinot is one of them), or 4 excluding one that is not available in testing. I got tickets for all of them filed now,

Bug#1071979: pinot: FTBFS with exiv2 0.28

2024-05-30 Thread Olly Betts
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 11:27:13PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > Would you review this patch, and upload it so that pinot rebuilds > cleanly once a newer Exiv2 is uploaded to unstable? Patch looks OK (though I don't know anything about the exiv2 API). The git packaging repo for pinot on salsa

Bug#1071979: pinot: FTBFS with exiv2 0.28

2024-05-26 Thread Pino Toscano
Source: pinot Version: 1.21-1 Severity: important Tags: patch ftbfs Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/FabriceColin/pinot/pull/11 Hi, pinot fails to build with the new stable series of the Exiv2 library, i.e. 0.28.x; that version is available in experimental as of this writing. Upstream