Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-07-18 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi Andreas, On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:03:58 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote: > Hello Patrick, > > I am sorry I cannot give you an estimate there. I will not upload > without approval/review by the main maintainters. > > An upload would go to experimental first. Splitting of the qt devel > packages (#

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-07-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-07-16 Patrick Franz wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 15:09:02 +0200 Andreas Metzler > [...] >> I have updated the packaging draft, adding the upstream change for Qt >> 5 and Qt 6 include split 09827ffc7745e7dc4275f1c6e46531a959be1f71. >> I think this is basically ready for experimental. >

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-07-16 Thread Patrick Franz
Hi Andreas, On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 15:09:02 +0200 Andreas Metzler [...] > I have updated the packaging draft, adding the upstream change for Qt > 5 and Qt 6 include split 09827ffc7745e7dc4275f1c6e46531a959be1f71. > > I think this is basically ready for experimental. I see there is good progress o

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-22 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-06-20 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2024-06-19 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > [...] >> It's likely that we'll start adding new headers only for Qt 6 once we stop >> doing feature releases of a Qt 5 based Kleopatra. So, yes, they are >> identical >> /now/ but most likely will not stay that way. >

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-20 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-06-19 Ingo Klöcker wrote: [...] > It's likely that we'll start adding new headers only for Qt 6 once we stop > doing feature releases of a Qt 5 based Kleopatra. So, yes, they are identical > /now/ but most likely will not stay that way. Thank you for the explanation. cu Andreas -- `Wh

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-19 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:15:23 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2024-06-17 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:33:46 +0200 Andreas Metzler > > wrote: > > > On 2024-06-17 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > What reverse dependencies? > > These: > ametzler@argenau:~$ grep-aptavail -FDepends libgpg

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-19 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-06-18 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2024-06-17 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:33:46 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > > Doesn't this break all reverse dependencies? > > What reverse dependencies? > These: > ametzler@argenau:~$ grep-aptavail -FDepends libgpgmepp6t64 -

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-06-17 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:33:46 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2024-06-17 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > > The idea is to keep the include files identical, but to make things > > > easier we will install the headers for Qt 5 and Qt 6 with different > > > prefixes i

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-17 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 18:33:46 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2024-06-17 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > The idea is to keep the include files identical, but to make things > > easier we will install the headers for Qt 5 and Qt 6 with different > > prefixes in the next version of gpgme (https://dev.gnup

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-17 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-06-17 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:35:03 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote: >> I have chosen to use separate, conflicting qt5/qt6 development packages. >> This is the ultra-conservative approach but I am not sure it is the >> best/right one. Currently all common files in the two

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-17 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:35:03 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote: > I have chosen to use separate, conflicting qt5/qt6 development packages. > This is the ultra-conservative approach but I am not sure it is the > best/right one. Currently all common files in the two dev-packages are > bit-for-bit identica

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-06-16 Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2024-06-15 Patrick Franz wrote: [...] >> Currently, gpgme offers Qt 5 bindings, but for Plasma 6 we will need the >> Qt 6 bindings for gpgme. Is it possible to add them ? > 1.19.0 added "Optionally, build QGpgME for Qt 6". Which > afaict gives the same

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2024-06-15 Patrick Franz wrote: > Package: gpgme1.0 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org > Dear Maintainer, > we are in the process of packaging the Plasma 6 desktop. The KDE stack > is using gpgme in some components, but for Plasma 6 everything > switched to Qt 6. > Curr

Bug#1073255: Qt 6 bindings for gpgme

2024-06-15 Thread Patrick Franz
Package: gpgme1.0 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org Dear Maintainer, we are in the process of packaging the Plasma 6 desktop. The KDE stack is using gpgme in some components, but for Plasma 6 everything switched to Qt 6. Currently, gpgme offers Qt 5 bindings, but for Plasma 6