On Tue Aug 27, 2024 at 1:11 PM CEST, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> The last upgrade with MA: same libraries running adequate 0.16.17 didn't
> produce a dpkg error. So it looks fixed to me.
Sebastian, thanks for the confirmation!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 2024-08-26 23:19:59 +0200, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> On Mon Aug 19, 2024 at 6:37 PM CEST, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > It still fails:
> [..]
>
> okay, this is starting to get embarassing. I'm confident that 0.16.17 fixes
> it,
> but so was with earlier attempts. if that fails agai
On Mon Aug 19, 2024 at 6:37 PM CEST, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> It still fails:
[..]
okay, this is starting to get embarassing. I'm confident that 0.16.17 fixes it,
but so was with earlier attempts. if that fails again, I'll setup a multi-arch
system to actually reproduce the issue (I can't on my
On 2024-08-24 21:41:03 +0200, Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas wrote:
> On Fri Aug 23, 2024 at 7:33 PM CEST, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2024-08-21 00:20:25 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> [..]
> > > I've uploaded a fix as 0.16.15 in experimental. please confirm whether
> > > that
> > > works f
On Fri Aug 23, 2024 at 7:33 PM CEST, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2024-08-21 00:20:25 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
[..]
> > I've uploaded a fix as 0.16.15 in experimental. please confirm whether that
> > works for you.
>
> It doesn't:
thanks for bearing with me. 0.16.16 in experimental it is
On 2024-08-21 00:20:25 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> hi Sebastian,
>
> On Mon Aug 19, 2024 at 6:37 PM CEST, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: reopen -1
> [..]
> > Note the occurences of gcc-14-base: two times without archi qualifieres
> > (incorrect), once with :amd64 and :i386 (correct)
hi Sebastian,
On Mon Aug 19, 2024 at 6:37 PM CEST, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
[..]
> Note the occurences of gcc-14-base: two times without archi qualifieres
> (incorrect), once with :amd64 and :i386 (correct).
thanks for reopening and for the provided details.
I've uploaded a
Control: reopen -1
On 2024-08-16 01:52:37 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Control: fixed -1 0.16.6
>
> On Tue Jul 30, 2024 at 3:16 PM CEST, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On 2024-07-30 14:16:19 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > > thanks Sebastian for the report.
> > >
> > > that'd
Hi
On 2024-07-30 14:16:19 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> thanks Sebastian for the report.
>
> that'd be because your have installed all of:
> libavcodec61, libavcodec61:i386, libavcodec61:amd64
No, I don't. I have libavcodec61:amd64 (native arch) and
libavcoded61:i386 installed.
Cheers
> i
thanks Sebastian for the report.
that'd be because your have installed all of:
libavcodec61, libavcodec61:i386, libavcodec61:amd64
it sounds like adequate should drop foo in the presence of any foo:arch
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: adequate
Version: 0.16.5
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
Recently, running adequate during apt upgrades started failing:
2024/07/30 10:46:11 "dpkg -L libcupsfilters1t64 cups-browsed adequate ben
libben-ocaml cups-filters-core-drivers libfontembed1t64 cups-filters
li
11 matches
Mail list logo
