Bug#1086462: Status of gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf migration to testing

2024-11-29 Thread Nicolas Schodet
Hi, * Keith Packard [2024-11-28 12:02]: > > 2. Somebody fixes the mips64el problem for gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf and then > > re-introduces mips64el as an architecture that gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf > > is > > built for. > I'm trying this approach now; my simple testing showed that adding >

Bug#1086462: Status of gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf migration to testing

2024-11-28 Thread Keith Packard
From: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 08:12:43 +0100 > 1. Keith files a bug with ftp.debian.org to remove the mips64el package of > gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf from testing, thus declaring that the removal > of mips64el from the package was indeed intentional. I've

Bug#1086462: Status of gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf migration to testing

2024-11-27 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 22:02:41 +0100 Nicolas Schodet wrote: > It seems that gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf still did not migrate to testing. > Is there something I can do to help? > > If I understand properly the problem, the code, or the GOT is too big > and relative offsets overflow. I have found a

Bug#1086462: Status of gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf migration to testing

2024-11-27 Thread Nicolas Schodet
Hello, I am part of the Debian LEGO Team and a sponsored maintainer of nxt-firmware, which depends on picolibc to build. It seems that gcc-riscv64-unknown-elf still did not migrate to testing. Is there something I can do to help? If I understand properly the problem, the code, or the GOT is too