On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 19:21:20 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Guillem Jover writes:
> > But I guess your plan of just accepting .asc, .pgp, and .gpg, and
> > warning to rename to .pgp for other extensions would be the safest
> > less disruptive path for now.
>
> The registered MIME file extensio
Guillem Jover writes:
> But I guess your plan of just accepting .asc, .pgp, and .gpg, and
> warning to rename to .pgp for other extensions would be the safest
> less disruptive path for now.
The registered MIME file extension for PGP keys is *.asc, see:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3156.ht
On Fri, 2024-11-29 at 09:27:57 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:31:58AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Package: apt
> > Version: 2.9.15
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: I pondered initially on important, but given that this
> > is a regression that prevents r
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:31:58AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Package: apt
> Version: 2.9.15
> Severity: serious
> Justification: I pondered initially on important, but given that this
> is a regression that prevents repo usage, it seems worth serious to me.
>
> Hi!
>
> The latest release mad
Package: apt
Version: 2.9.15
Severity: serious
Justification: I pondered initially on important, but given that this
is a regression that prevents repo usage, it seems worth serious to me.
Hi!
The latest release made some repos stop working as apt is now refusing
to use the specified keyring whe
5 matches
Mail list logo
