Bug#1099894: transition: addresses-for-gnustep/gnustep-addresses

2025-03-13 Thread Yavor Doganov
Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2025-03-09 17:28:26 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 2025-03-09 14:41:21 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > > > > > Both rdeps agenda.app and gnumail build fine against the new > > > version. > > > > Please go ahead. > > binNMUs s

Bug#1099894: transition: addresses-for-gnustep/gnustep-addresses

2025-03-13 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2025-03-09 17:28:26 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 2025-03-09 14:41:21 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: addresses-for-gnus...@packages.debian.org > > Control: affects -1 + src:addresses-for-g

Bug#1099894: transition: addresses-for-gnustep/gnustep-addresses

2025-03-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2025-03-09 14:41:21 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: addresses-for-gnus...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:addresses-for-gnustep + src:gnustep-addresses > User: release.debian@packages.deb

Bug#1099894: transition: addresses-for-gnustep/gnustep-addresses

2025-03-09 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: addresses-for-gnus...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:addresses-for-gnustep + src:gnustep-addresses User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Our intention was to do this transition together with the r