Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

2025-05-07 Thread Mathias Gibbens
One minor regression involving NVME hotplugging has been identified; I've just opened bug #1104889 about this. While not a show-stopper, it does make the use of NVME virtual devices impossible in Incus. Mathias signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

2025-04-04 Thread Michael Tokarev
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-qemu-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! I would like to include upstream qemu version 10.0 in trixie. Currently, qemu is at release-candidate stage, 10.0.0-rc0, and the actual release is planned for 2025-04-15 (or 2025-04-22 if a criti

Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

2025-03-31 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Thu, 2025-03-27 at 09:33 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > I uploaded qemu 10.0.0-rc1 to unstable yesterday, now it is already built > and installed on all architectures, ready for testing. So far just one minor issue has been found, and is already fixed upstream[1]. I'll be updating the Incus

Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

2025-03-27 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 27/03/2025 08:52, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Michael, On 21-03-2025 09:00, Michael Tokarev wrote: I plan to upload 10.0.0-rc0 to sid tomorrow, once debci tests for the current version in experimental are completed. Do I understand correctly you consider this pre-approval request just for the c

Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

2025-03-27 Thread Michael Tokarev
27.03.2025 10:52, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Michael, On 21-03-2025 09:00, Michael Tokarev wrote: I plan to upload 10.0.0-rc0 to sid tomorrow, once debci tests for the current version in experimental are completed. Do I understand correctly you consider this pre-approval request just for the chan

Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

2025-03-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Michael, On 21-03-2025 09:00, Michael Tokarev wrote: I plan to upload 10.0.0-rc0 to sid tomorrow, once debci tests for the current version in experimental are completed. Do I understand correctly you consider this pre-approval request just for the change from 10.0.0-rc* to 10.0.0, right?

Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

2025-03-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
25.03.2025 16:49, Mathias Gibbens wrote: Yes, fixing argument typing was one of the larger changes[1], along with dealing with the removal of virtfs-proxy-helper[2]. The need to fix argument types was an obvious change, but the removal of virtfs- proxy-helper wasn't notice until Colin filed a

Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

2025-03-25 Thread Mathias Gibbens
On Tue, 2025-03-25 at 12:14 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 21.03.2025 18:34, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > >    Just a heads up that this might impact Incus/LXD. The release of qemu > > 9.2 required several updates due to API changes; I haven't looked at > > qemu 10 at all, so I don't know what sort of

Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

2025-03-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
21.03.2025 18:34, Mathias Gibbens wrote: Just a heads up that this might impact Incus/LXD. The release of qemu 9.2 required several updates due to API changes; I haven't looked at qemu 10 at all, so I don't know what sort of changes were made in the upcoming release. I was able to find just

Bug#1100970: pre-approval: qemu 10.0 for trixie

2025-03-21 Thread Mathias Gibbens
Just a heads up that this might impact Incus/LXD. The release of qemu 9.2 required several updates due to API changes; I haven't looked at qemu 10 at all, so I don't know what sort of changes were made in the upcoming release. I don't think this should block the upload of qemu to unstable, jus