On Tue, 3 Jun 2025, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote:
> Is there a Debian policy entry about that point?
Yes.
> The thing is it confuses contributors. Having no upstream project
> declares a package as dead.
No.
And anyway we’re in deep freeze, so this is not important
right now and just distracting.
Hello Thorsten,
Thank you for your reply and feedback.
Am 03.06.2025 14:38 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025, Christian Buhtz wrote:
If there is no upstream project anymore and the Debian package is kind
of "upstream" the "homepage" should make this explicit via pointing to
the salsa
On Tue, 3 Jun 2025, Christian Buhtz wrote:
>If there is no upstream project anymore and the Debian package is kind
>of "upstream" the "homepage" should make this explicit via pointing to
>the salsa repo for example.
No, absolutely not. The homepage is the upstream homepage,
and if there is no ups
Package: xloadimage
Version: 4.1-2
Severity: normal
Hello Thorsten,
tracker.debian.org does not show a "homepage" for that package.
If there is no upstream project anymore and the Debian package is kind of
"upstream" the "homepage" should make this explicit via pointing to the salsa
repo for exam
4 matches
Mail list logo
