Bug#130487: postfix: handling of aliases broken.

2006-07-13 Thread Frédéric Brière
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 09:50:17AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: > It is, nonetheless, arguable that /etc/aliases.db could be something > completely different. As I understand it, moving aliases.db elsewhere (and adjusting $alias_* accordingly) will merely result in newaliases being run at every upgr

Bug#130487: postfix: handling of aliases broken.

2006-03-31 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:18:06AM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > 1.) "rm -f /etc/aliases.db" > 2.) "newaliases" > both is terrible wrong. > first, you have only an assumption what /etc/aliases.db is, and > an assumption that you can delete and regenerate it. both is wrong, > the file could be