On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 08:11:29PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:45:19AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Please consider either changing to a really native package (without
> > debian-version in the version number)
>
> I guess I would consider a patch to do this if I was sen
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:45:19AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Please consider either changing to a really native package (without
> debian-version in the version number)
I guess I would consider a patch to do this if I was sent one, but
as I said I've never found a need to do this, and have not be
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 09:30:14PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 04:56:26PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > xfsprogs is packaged with a debian component (always -1) in its version
> > number. If it's a native package, then this component will never be
> > used, and should be remo
3 matches
Mail list logo
