Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes:
Just to be clear, as far as I know, this entire bug report is if
anything a wishlist request. While it's almost certainly possible to
change/improve our emacs policy, the current policy requires any package
that wants to use the debian emacs
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
This is a serious WTF in emacsen-common and/or emacs itself. It’s not
appropriate to add a dependency on emacsen-common just for the sake of
including support for an editor.
The bug (CCed) has been known for 8 years, so I’ll assume it won’t be
fixed
severity 586328 serious
thanks
Le vendredi 18 juin 2010 à 14:36 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit :
Preparing to replace gtk-doc-tools 1.10-1 (using
.../gtk-doc-tools_1.15-1_all.deb) ...
ERROR: emacsen-common being used before being configured.
ERROR: This is likely a bug in the gtk-doc-tools
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
severity 586328 serious
thanks
Le vendredi 18 juin 2010 à 14:36 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit :
Preparing to replace gtk-doc-tools 1.10-1 (using
.../gtk-doc-tools_1.15-1_all.deb) ...
ERROR: emacsen-common being used before being configured.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:00:36 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
This is a serious WTF in emacsen-common and/or emacs itself. It’s not
appropriate to add a dependency on emacsen-common just for the sake of
including support for an editor.
emacsen-common is tiny and has no dependencies, so it
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes:
As I've said before, while it might be possible to rework things to
remove the dependency, the original problem was complicated -- the
current arrangement wasn't chosen arbirarily. And in general, if you
want to use a compiled language, it's not
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
emacsen-common is tiny and has no dependencies, so it doesn't seem that
big a burden.
I believe that's not the core complaint. If I recall correctly,
packages are required to depend on some combination of
emacsen/emacsXY/xemacsXY, rather than
7 matches
Mail list logo
