Hi,
Same problem here, rsync seems to hang" but as an strace show, there's a
time-out after a while
| select(5, NULL, [4], NULL, {60, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
I invoke rsync from cron via the rsnapshot script, but it makes no
difference invoking it from a shell.
Notice that I get the problem doing
On Thu 07 Apr 2005, Serge van Ginderachter wrote:
>
> Same problem here, rsync seems to hang" but as an strace show, there's a
> time-out after a while
>
> | select(5, NULL, [4], NULL, {60, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)
>
> I invoke rsync from cron via the rsnapshot script, but it makes no
> differenc
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 20:31 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> The current 2.6.4 version does indeed have extra code to prevent
> timeouts happening, however that should only take effect when both sides
In the mean time I noticed other situations where both sides needed to
be upgraded.
Where I first
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The current 2.6.4 version does indeed have extra code to prevent
> timeouts happening, however that should only take effect when both sides
> of the transfer has at least version 2.6.4 and when the --timeout option
> is used...
> Of course, there have b
In the mean time I have been experimenting with the newest version.
Troubleshooting was a little hard, as I equally was struggling with an
NFS problem at my provider. It is that NFS space I am rsync'ing with.
As of today, I have no more time-out problems. I am now using the latest
2.6.4-1 versio
On Sat 23 Apr 2005, Serge van Ginderachter wrote:
> In the mean time I have been experimenting with the newest version.
> Troubleshooting was a little hard, as I equally was struggling with an
> NFS problem at my provider. It is that NFS space I am rsync'ing with.
>
> As of today, I have no more
Paul Slootman wrote:
> My suspicions would be NFS (but then I'm not objective :-)
I can totally share your point of view in a very subjective way.
> Do you mean that without the timeout option, it does work with this
> scponly shell?
Yes, exactly.
> I would expect that "scponly" would imply not be
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (I didn't notice this message at first, as it was sent to -quiet...)
>> This is very reproducible for me, just by rsyncing my Gnus nnmail e-mail
>> directory.
> Hmmm
> Could I trouble you to try again with 2.6.3? There have been a lot of
> improveme
8 matches
Mail list logo
