On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:20:20PM +, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 04:36:36PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:05:55PM +, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:30:28AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > > The accepted way of doing
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 04:36:36PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:05:55PM +, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:30:28AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > The accepted way of doing this is with
> > > find . -xdev -print0 |xargs -0 grep foo
> > >
> >
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:05:55PM +, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:30:28AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > The accepted way of doing this is with
> > find . -xdev -print0 |xargs -0 grep foo
> >
> > Indeed, even grep -r is considered to be bloat, since "find" supports
>
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 09:30:28AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> The accepted way of doing this is with
> find . -xdev -print0 |xargs -0 grep foo
>
> Indeed, even grep -r is considered to be bloat, since "find" supports
> many options which don't each need to be implemented in grep, too.
Right,
The accepted way of doing this is with
find . -xdev -print0 |xargs -0 grep foo
Indeed, even grep -r is considered to be bloat, since "find" supports
many options which don't each need to be implemented in grep, too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
5 matches
Mail list logo
