David Kalnischkies (el 2009-11-02 a les 16:40:00 +0100) va dir::
> A user who mixed sources very likely mixes also packages.
> As a package doesn't need to depend on essential packages,
> apt tries to install in a dist(ribution)-upgrade ALL essential
> packages it can find in all sources to protec
Hi, David:
On Monday 02 November 2009 16:40:00 David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Hi all,
[...]
>
> The "real" bug here showed by diff (and a few other before)
> is therefore something like this:
> New essential package A replaces old essential package B.
> (Package B is now a transitional package to A
On 2009-11-02 16:40:00 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> The message says:
> "This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!"
Well, this was "The following essential packages will be removed."
I found confusing.
> So it is already open to the fact that it is maybe wrong to c
Hi all,
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Thanks, Raphael. This is clearly a problem in apt.
Funny, i think it is a feature and i will try to describe why now. :)
(I want to do it earlier, but i somehow managed to forget it...)
2009/11/2 Ivan Vilata i Balaguer :
> I have ``apticron`` ins
Am Montag, den 02.11.2009, 09:56 + schrieb Ivan Vilata i Balaguer:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.7.20.2+lenny1
> Followup-For: Bug #216768
>
>
> My APT setup includes sources from Lenny (stable) and Squeeze (testing),
> pinned so that only
> certain packages get pulled from testing. I have `
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.20.2+lenny1
Followup-For: Bug #216768
My APT setup includes sources from Lenny (stable) and Squeeze (testing), pinned
so that only
certain packages get pulled from testing. I have ``apticron`` installed and
since I made the
mixed setup with pinning, it reports that
6 matches
Mail list logo
