Bug#218897: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package

2010-08-25 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 10:30:50 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml index 9fe7158..c7f2a4e 100644 --- a/policy.sgml +++ b/policy.sgml @@ -1214,9 +1214,11 @@ /p p - You should not use prgndpkg-divert/prgn on a file - belonging to

Bug#218897: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package

2010-08-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org writes: Ok, even if this has been merged already and closed, I've been meaning to mention something I've considered implementing. dpkg-divert would get the package name from the DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_PACKAGE environment variable, which would change the default of

Bug#218897: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package

2010-07-03 Thread Russ Allbery
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes: Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org writes: I think it should be more clear and mention that --package must be used when adding or removing diversions. --list{,name} and --truename don't require --package. Good point. Here's an updated patch. I've now

Bug#218897: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package

2010-07-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Thu, 01 Jul 2010, Russ Allbery wrote: Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org writes: I think it should be more clear and mention that --package must be used when adding or removing diversions. --list{,name} and --truename don't require --package. Good point. Here's an updated

Bug#218897: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package

2010-07-02 Thread Raphael Geissert
On Thursday 01 July 2010 12:30:50 Russ Allbery wrote: Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org writes: I think it should be more clear and mention that --package must be used when adding or removing diversions. --list{,name} and --truename don't require --package. Good point. Here's an

Bug#218897: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package

2010-07-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org writes: I think it should be more clear and mention that --package must be used when adding or removing diversions. --list{,name} and --truename don't require --package. Good point. Here's an updated patch. diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml index

Bug#218897: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package

2010-06-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Josip Rodin j...@srce.hr writes: On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:49:41PM +0900, YAMASHITA Junji wrote: I noticed that desktop-base package adds local diversion, reported as Bug#218091. I supposed that this isn't a right thing and is a serious bug. But I can't find a description of this point in

Bug#218897: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package

2010-06-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:21:13 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml index 9fe7158..587a6b2 100644 --- a/policy.sgml +++ b/policy.sgml @@ -1214,9 +1214,11 @@ /p p - You should not use prgndpkg-divert/prgn on a file - belonging to

Bug#218897: Explicitily disallow adding local diversion by package

2010-06-30 Thread Raphael Geissert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Russ Allbery wrote: diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml index 9fe7158..587a6b2 100644 --- a/policy.sgml +++ b/policy.sgml @@ -1214,9 +1214,11 @@ /p p - You should not use prgndpkg-divert/prgn on a file - belonging to