Bug#220581: GTypist 2.9 package

2011-11-21 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Samstag, den 19.11.2011, 17:21 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter: Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net writes: Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 22:05 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter: what about gtypist-mode.el? It does not seem to be included in the 2.9 (binary) package. I think it's useful and

Bug#220581: GTypist 2.9 package

2011-11-20 Thread Felix Natter
Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net writes: Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 21:43 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter: Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net writes: Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter: [..] #220581 (gtypist: VIM syntax highlighting) = as of

Bug#220581: GTypist 2.9 package

2011-11-18 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter: [..] #220581 (gtypist: VIM syntax highlighting) = as of ~2000-2003, RMS does not allow/want us to include the VIM Syntax highlighting mode in the package. What is the debian policy on this, maybe we should include it in the debian

Bug#220581: GTypist 2.9 package

2011-11-18 Thread Felix Natter
Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net writes: Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter: [..] #220581 (gtypist: VIM syntax highlighting) = as of ~2000-2003, RMS does not allow/want us to include theVIM Syntax highlighting mode in the package. What is the

Bug#220581: GTypist 2.9 package

2011-11-18 Thread Felix Natter
Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net writes: [...] hi Daniel, what about gtypist-mode.el? It does not seem to be included in the 2.9 (binary) package. I think it's useful and should be included, if necessary in a separate package. Thanks and Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- To

Bug#220581: GTypist 2.9 package

2011-11-18 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 21:43 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter: Daniel Leidert daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net writes: Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter: [..] #220581 (gtypist: VIM syntax highlighting) = as of ~2000-2003, RMS does not allow/want us to include the