Am Samstag, den 19.11.2011, 17:21 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
> Daniel Leidert writes:
> > Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 22:05 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
> >
> >> what about gtypist-mode.el? It does not seem to be included in the 2.9
> >> (binary) package. I think it's useful and should be included
Daniel Leidert writes:
> Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 21:43 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
>> Daniel Leidert writes:
>>
>> > Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
>> >
>> > [..]
>> >> #220581 (gtypist: VIM syntax highlighting)
>> >> => as of ~2000-2003, RMS does not allow/wan
Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 21:43 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
> Daniel Leidert writes:
>
> > Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
> >
> > [..]
> >> #220581 (gtypist: VIM syntax highlighting)
> >> => as of ~2000-2003, RMS does not allow/want us to include theVIM
>
Daniel Leidert writes:
[...]
hi Daniel,
what about gtypist-mode.el? It does not seem to be included in the 2.9
(binary) package. I think it's useful and should be included, if
necessary in a separate package.
Thanks and Best Regards,
--
Felix Natter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs
Daniel Leidert writes:
> Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
>
> [..]
>> #220581 (gtypist: VIM syntax highlighting)
>> => as of ~2000-2003, RMS does not allow/want us to include theVIM
>> Syntax
>> highlighting mode in the package. What is the debian policy on th
Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 15:38 +0100 schrieb Felix Natter:
[..]
> #220581 (gtypist: VIM syntax highlighting)
> => as of ~2000-2003, RMS does not allow/want us to include the VIM Syntax
> highlighting mode in the package. What is the debian policy on this,
> maybe we should include it in the debi
6 matches
Mail list logo