Hi Bernd,
On 4/6/07, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:41:00PM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> OK, I've read it, but I still don't get three things:
>
> - why ifconfig can set promisc mode and then get it right?
if you set promisc over the old ioctl interface,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:41:00PM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> OK, I've read it, but I still don't get three things:
>
> - why ifconfig can set promisc mode and then get it right?
if you set promisc over the old ioctl interface, then it is reported by the
kernel correctly.
> - why iproute doe
On 4/6/07, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernd, may be you can give a link to the net-dev discussion as to get
> more information about this issue? I googled a bit but I couldn't find
> that discussion.
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/net/0202.1/0018.html
OK, I've read i
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:58:12PM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to help on the triage of old bugs on net-tools.
thanks for your help.
> Bernd, may be you can give a link to the net-dev discussion as to get
> more information about this issue? I googled a bit but I couldn't find
>
Hi, I'm trying to help on the triage of old bugs on net-tools.
I tried to reproduce this, but it seems that /sbin/ip suffers the same
problem, at least with current etch kernels. If I put the device on
promisc mode with tcpdump, neither of them will see it. If I use ip l
set eth0 promisc on, it wo
5 matches
Mail list logo
