Bug#224301: [Adduser-devel] Bug#224301: Some thoughts about this bug report

2005-10-21 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:36:10AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > (Marc pinged me on IRC about this bug report in adduser) Thanks for your help! > First of all, I think that adduser should probably make better use of > the locales information for this Yes/No answer. I think that would be a go

Bug#224301: [Adduser-devel] Bug#224301: Some thoughts about this bug report

2005-10-21 Thread Christian Perrier
> > This fr.po file for adduser is under work now and you should soon have > > a new version anyway with these fixes among others. > > OK, I'll wait for that before applying stuff. Better not mess with > things that I don't understand. You should also have an incoming mail by Thomas Huriaux (th

Bug#224301: [Adduser-devel] Bug#224301: Some thoughts about this bug report

2005-10-21 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:03:34PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > This fr.po file for adduser is under work now and you should soon have > > > a new version anyway with these fixes among others. > > > > OK, I'll wait for that before applying stuff. Better not mess with > > things that I don

Bug#224301: [Adduser-devel] Bug#224301: Some thoughts about this bug report

2005-10-21 Thread Denis Barbier
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:23:36AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:36:10AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > (Marc pinged me on IRC about this bug report in adduser) > > Thanks for your help! > > > First of all, I think that adduser should probably make better use of > > t

Bug#224301: [Adduser-devel] Bug#224301: Some thoughts about this bug report

2005-10-22 Thread Marc Haber
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:02:43AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > There is very good documentation in libc.info, section "Yes-or-No Questions", > but unfortunately it is not relevant here because adduser is a perl script. > So I had a look at perllocale(1), which has some nice tips, in particular >

Bug#224301: [Adduser-devel] Bug#224301: Some thoughts about this bug report

2005-10-24 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:02:28PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > Of course this comment may be improved ;) > > You need to call xgettext with the -c flag so that comments are > > inserted > > into PO files. > > that would be XGETTEXT = xgettext -c in po/Makefile, right? Done. Hmmm, I prefer adding

Bug#224301: [Adduser-devel] Bug#224301: Some thoughts about this bug report

2005-10-24 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:51:56PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:02:28PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > > Of course this comment may be improved ;) > > > You need to call xgettext with the -c flag so that comments are > > > inserted > > > into PO files. > > > > that would

Bug#224301: [Adduser-devel] Bug#224301: Some thoughts about this bug report

2005-10-26 Thread Denis Barbier
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 07:21:59AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > Frankly, I see no reason to keep this wrapper. If you do not want > > localized messages, run your scripts with LC_ALL=C. > > It is consistent with the way gettext is used in C programs, I tend to disagree, but that's really not imp