Hi,
I'd like to lobby again for the inclusion of my patch at
http://bugs.debian.org/238687 again, which reports Alpha
subarchitectures and the Debian version. The motivation is to decide
whether to drop ev4 or ev56 support. The objections were:
* Subarchitecture information should come from anoth
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:38:35PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to lobby again for the inclusion of my patch at
> http://bugs.debian.org/238687 again, which reports Alpha
> subarchitectures and the Debian version. The motivation is to decide
> whether to drop ev4 or ev56 support.
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:38:35PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
>> I'd like to lobby again for the inclusion of my patch at
>> http://bugs.debian.org/238687 again, which reports Alpha
>> subarchitectures and the Debian version. The motivation is to decid
Hi,
to decide what subarchitectures should be supported in future
releases, it would really be helpful to see which are in current
use. So I suggest something like the following patch. It only
determines this information for Alpha, since I'm not sure how to get
it for other architectures, and in p
[Falk Hueffner]
> So I suggest something like the following patch. It only determines
> this information for Alpha, since I'm not sure how to get it for
> other architectures, and in particular, which categories would be
> relevant. Opinions?
Thank you for the patch. But I do not want to teach th
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Falk Hueffner]
>> So I suggest something like the following patch. It only determines
>> this information for Alpha, since I'm not sure how to get it for
>> other architectures, and in particular, which categories would be
>> relevant. Opinions?
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
