Bug#243938: ITP: rkhunter

2005-08-23 Thread Frederik Dannemare
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 17:24, Micah Anderson wrote: [ ... ] > Perhaps someone else can take the packaging to get it going, Yes, I think this would be best for everybody. > and when > you are under less pressure and have more time can co-maintain or > take it over? I'd be happy to help co-mai

Bug#243938: ITP: rkhunter

2005-08-14 Thread Frederik Dannemare
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 05:41, Matt Taggart wrote: > The ITP for rkhunter has been quiet since Feb 15. > > Frederik, > I understand your concern about waiting for upstream to integrate > patches you sent so that the initial version of the package gets to > start out with a more reasonable debian

Bug#243938: ITP: rkhunter

2005-08-16 Thread Micah Anderson
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > On Tuesday 09 August 2005 05:41, Matt Taggart wrote: > > The ITP for rkhunter has been quiet since Feb 15. > > > > Frederik, > > I understand your concern about waiting for upstream to integrate > > patches you sent so that the initial version of th

Bug#243938: ITP: rkhunter

2005-08-16 Thread Emanuele Rocca
* Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2005-08-16 10:24 -0500]: > On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > > I'll see what I can do. Hopefully, I'll manage to find some time in the > > upcoming weekends... > > Do not apply more stress than necessary. Myself, or one of the others here

Bug#243938: ITP: rkhunter

2005-08-08 Thread Matt Taggart
The ITP for rkhunter has been quiet since Feb 15. Frederik, I understand your concern about waiting for upstream to integrate patches you sent so that the initial version of the package gets to start out with a more reasonable debian diff. Has upstream taken them yet? I don't think we should wa