On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 14:24 -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Scott James Remnant wrote:
So there are three possibilities:
* dpkg 1.10.11 did not add support for arch-specific entries in
*Depends* and closing 170575 with dpkg 1.10.11's changelog was an
error.
On 2005-03-18 Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 20:42 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
reopen 252657
# more clarification needed, I do not intend to play BTS ping-pong
Uh, my bad -- the -done on that was accidental. This bug should
remain open.
Splendid.
On Friday 18 March 2005 23:22, Scott James Remnant wrote:
Support would be simply a matter of passing 1 to the witharch
parameter -- however I suspect the consequences of that are far more
reaching.
Hmm .. using e.g. ${shlibs:Depends} can already be arch specific. And due to
problems with
reopen 252657
# more clarification needed, I do not intend to play BTS ping-pong
thanks
On 2005-03-18 Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 17:36 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
| dpkg (1.10.11) unstable; urgency=low
| * All dependency fields parsed by
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 20:42 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
reopen 252657
# more clarification needed, I do not intend to play BTS ping-pong
Uh, my bad -- the -done on that was accidental. This bug should
remain open.
On 2005-03-18 Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
On
5 matches
Mail list logo
