Bug#254223: freetype 2.1.10

2005-10-27 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:24:20PM +0100, Christophe Rhodes wrote: Hi, It's definitely broken here, where here is now a Debian unstable x86 box at home (as opposed to a Ubuntu amd64 box at work). I've put a screenshot up at http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/.png. In that

Bug#254223: freetype 2.1.10

2005-10-17 Thread Christophe Rhodes
Hi, As far as I can tell, the problem regarding the width of the m character is still present in freetype 2.1.10, though I should disclaim that slightly because I am testing a rebuilt version of the package on my Ubuntu workstation, so it's possible that there's a lurking incompatibility, or else

Bug#254223: freetype 2.1.10

2005-10-17 Thread Will Newton
On Monday 17 October 2005 12:28, Christophe Rhodes wrote: Hi, As far as I can tell, the problem regarding the width of the m character is still present in freetype 2.1.10, though I should disclaim that slightly because I am testing a rebuilt version of the package on my Ubuntu workstation,

Bug#254223: freetype 2.1.10

2005-10-17 Thread Christophe Rhodes
Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Monday 17 October 2005 12:28, Christophe Rhodes wrote: Hi, As far as I can tell, the problem regarding the width of the m character is still present in freetype 2.1.10, though I should disclaim that slightly because I am testing a rebuilt version of

Bug#254223: freetype 2.1.10

2005-10-17 Thread Will Newton
On Monday 17 October 2005 20:24, Christophe Rhodes wrote: It's definitely broken here, where here is now a Debian unstable x86 box at home (as opposed to a Ubuntu amd64 box at work). I've put a screenshot up at http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/.png. In that screenshot, you