Bug#258043: status update

2005-10-05 Thread Horms
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:02:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 11:20 +0900, Horms wrote: > > Sure, though you might want to make some scope for other patches, > > as I know they creep in from time to time. For instance, sometimes > > we end up with security patches that are m

Bug#258043: status update

2005-10-05 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 11:20 +0900, Horms wrote: > Sure, though you might want to make some scope for other patches, > as I know they creep in from time to time. For instance, sometimes > we end up with security patches that are missing upstream, of corse > we submit them, and they usually get incop

Bug#258043: status update

2005-09-28 Thread Horms
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:41:40AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > reassign 258043 linux-2.6 > stop > > [2.6.7 is no longer in any release, reassigning to linux-2.6.] > > Today we have a general policy for what patches go into the Debian > source: http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelPatchAcceptance

Bug#258043: status update

2005-09-28 Thread dann frazier
reassign 258043 linux-2.6 stop [2.6.7 is no longer in any release, reassigning to linux-2.6.] Today we have a general policy for what patches go into the Debian source: http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines And, all patches are now split up and available in the linux-pat