On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:59:13PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Could the maintainers comment on this patch? As long as type-handling
exists, it should have a man page, I think.
Yes, but you should understand that there is a lot to do in
GNU/kFreeBSD, and adding a manpage for a package that
Could the maintainers comment on this patch? As long as type-handling
exists, it should have a man page, I think.
Btw., I noticed that if you apply this patch, you should also fix the
description to no longer refer to README.Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:37:03AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Hi, I've transcribed the README.Debian into a man page. Attached is a
patch that puts the man page into the source tree and removes the
README.Debian.
Hi!
I'm not the maintainer (anymore), but are you aware this utility is
Robert Millan wrote:
I'm not the maintainer (anymore), but are you aware this utility is
deprecated in favour of dpkg aliases now? (see #291939)
I was not aware of that, but judging from the discussion, it will still
be hundreds of years before type-handling disappears entirely.
--
To
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:20:47AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Robert Millan wrote:
I'm not the maintainer (anymore), but are you aware this utility is
deprecated in favour of dpkg aliases now? (see #291939)
I was not aware of that, but judging from the discussion, it will still
be
tags 264118 + patch
stop
Hi, I've transcribed the README.Debian into a man page. Attached is a
patch that puts the man page into the source tree and removes the
README.Debian.
diff -Nru /tmp/pc5d7sIXZl/type-handling-0.2.16/debian/changelog /tmp/8Qw3N7vI4K/type-handling-0.2.17/debian/changelog
6 matches
Mail list logo