On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:44:25PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
|| This is a woody vs. sarge difference. On sarge, linux/x25.h says:
||
|| struct x25_address {
|| char x25_addr[16];
|| };
||
|| so the current code, with sizeof(struct x25_address) is correct and
|| changing it would ac
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:36:21PM +0200, Cesare Tensi wrote:
>> The bugs #271678 (also #302181) is fixed in -10, so you can close it.
>> (X25 Compiled problem).
> It is not fixed, the code still reads sizeof(struct x25_address) and I
> thin
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:32:04AM +0200, Cesare Tensi wrote:
> If you want I can connect machines on the X25 router and tested it. I
> eat sometimes C but sometimes I'm eating network too.
I think the question is pure compile time. why does the reporter need
"sizeof(x25_address)" when it is clear
Hello,
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:36:21PM +0200, Cesare Tensi wrote:
> The bugs #271678 (also #302181) is fixed in -10, so you can close it.
> (X25 Compiled problem).
It is not fixed, the code still reads sizeof(struct x25_address) and I
think this is correct, since it compiles with recent GCC.
4 matches
Mail list logo
