Hi,
Thanks for participating in this discussion. I guess the way forward is to
ship a /usr/share/doc/doc-debian/README file with instructions on the various
ways as posted here on how to get typesettable versions. (Or anybody has
better ideas?)
Anyway, I'll try to get to that. (As always:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:05:34AM +0200, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > But then the question becomes: what is the authoritative version?
>
> Was the Social Contract approved by a General Resolution?
>
> If so, then the authoritative version is the text that appeared in
Diederik de Haas wrote:
> But then the question becomes: what is the authoritative version?
Was the Social Contract approved by a General Resolution?
If so, then the authoritative version is the text that appeared in the
GR ballot.
Gerardo
On donderdag 9 september 2021 05:56:17 CEST Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:11 PM Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > But then the question becomes: what is the authoritative version?
>
> The other copies of it (in doc-debian and the doc directory of the
> Debian apt archive) are all
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:11 PM Diederik de Haas wrote:
> But then the question becomes: what is the authoritative version?
The other copies of it (in doc-debian and the doc directory of the
Debian apt archive) are all copied/built from the version on the
website.
On woensdag 8 september 2021 09:22:11 CEST Gard Spreemann wrote:
> there should perhaps be an authoritative version of the text,
> from which PDF, whatever-printable, HTML, etc. can be generated
I think that's a good idea.
But then the question becomes: what is the authoritative version?
I get
Diederik de Haas writes:
> I only looked at the pdf and it's a very nice start, thanks!
>
> […]
Thanks for the feedback.
Daniel Lange's email made me think that there should perhaps be an
authoritative version of the text, from which PDF, whatever-printable,
HTML, etc. can be generated (using
On dinsdag 7 september 2021 14:58:59 CEST Elena ``of Valhalla'' Grandi wrote:
> On 2021-09-06 at 22:58:54 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > I wanted to print the Debian Social Contract, which turned out to be WAY
> > more difficult then I expected and then it should be.
> > [...]
> > Then I went
On 2021-09-06 at 22:58:54 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> I wanted to print the Debian Social Contract, which turned out to be WAY
> more difficult then I expected and then it should be.
> [...]
> Then I went looking for a PDF version and didn't find anything.
There is a PDF version in the
On dinsdag 7 september 2021 11:26:15 CEST Gard Spreemann wrote:
> Diederik de Haas writes:
> > I wanted to print the Debian Social Contract, which turned out to be WAY
> > more difficult then I expected and then it should be.
> > ...
>
> Are any of these helpful? I'm happy to do more iterations
Diederik de Haas writes:
> I wanted to print the Debian Social Contract, which turned out to be WAY
> more difficult then I expected and then it should be.
>
> So I went to https://www.debian.org/social_contract and wanted to print
> that. Apparently there isn't a print stylesheet for it, so if
Package: doc-debian
Version: 6.5
Followup-For: Bug #273323
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-proj...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I wanted to print the Debian Social Contract, which turned out to be WAY
more difficult then I expected and then it should be.
So I went to
12 matches
Mail list logo
