reassign 280492 kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha
thanks
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:21:47PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> [snip]
> > The patch from ultramonkey.org above was fished out of
> > a Red Hat Kernel RPM (by me). It still seems to be used
> > in their latest kernel (27.0.1.EL.um.1
Horms wrote:
[snip]
> The patch from ultramonkey.org above was fished out of
> a Red Hat Kernel RPM (by me). It still seems to be used
> in their latest kernel (27.0.1.EL.um.1), so I am going to apply that.
> But for the other architectures (mips and alpha) there does not
> seem to be a fix availa
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 11:25:03AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> I am uneasy about closing a valid bug that has not been completely
> fixed. But feel free to downgrade the importance/tags if you wish.
Ok, that sounds like a fair compromise.
> However, I would feel better if you fixed it for th
I am uneasy about closing a valid bug that has not been completely
fixed. But feel free to downgrade the importance/tags if you wish.
However, I would feel better if you fixed it for the arches where we
have a patch.
Thanks,
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 10:47:18AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> package kernel-source-2.4.27
> reopen 280492
> thanks
>
> > Both 2.4 and 2.6 upstream do not NULL terminate dest
> > if count is exceeded. This is documented in the kernel
> > and appears to be quite intentional. I am closing thi
Thanks for the extra information.
I will look into applying those patches.
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
package kernel-source-2.4.27
reopen 280492
thanks
> Both 2.4 and 2.6 upstream do not NULL terminate dest
> if count is exceeded. This is documented in the kernel
> and appears to be quite intentional. I am closing this
> accordingly.
I think you missed the point here. The problem is that if the c
7 matches
Mail list logo
