retitle 281050 xserver-xfree86: [i810] memory leak provoked by animated cursors
used with gdk_cursor_unref()
tag 281050 + upstream
forwarded 281050 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1043
thanks
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:00:02PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Related bugs in other lo
Hello,
> X footprint keeps growing because of repeatable memory allocations for the
> cursor
> and gdk_cursor_unref() failures to free that memory. However, this doesn't
> happen
> with all types of cursors. Only *animated* ones are affected (I base
> this hypothesis on my tests).
Indeed, I swi
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:00:02PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> After a few hours of investigation I've tracked down this bug. At
> least I've discovered what code causes Xserver to leak memory, when
> the bug is "exploited" by gpdf. It's as simple as the following:
Nice work. It explains why
Hello,
After a few hours of investigation I've tracked down this bug. At least I've
discovered what code causes Xserver to leak memory, when the bug is
"exploited" by gpdf. It's as simple as the following:
cursor = gdk_cursor_new_for_display(display, GDK_WATCH);
// ... //
gdk_cursor_unref(curso
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 11:59 +0200, Gintautas Miliauskas wrote:
>
> I intended to say by the second paragraph that it would might be more
> useful to use X.Org for everyday work. I am not sure if Ubuntu's X.Org
> can be installed without problems on a standard Debian unstable system,
I and other
Hello,
> > > I just tried gpdf on a large file with X.Org on Ubuntu Hoary (booted
> > > from a live CD). It appears that the problem is still there, but to a
> > > lesser extent. The PDF file that made XFree86 suck 200+ MB only
> > > expanded the X.Org server to 60-70MB. After a few minutes usa
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 04:50:04PM -0500, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 23:22 +0200, Gintautas Miliauskas wrote:
> >
> > I just tried gpdf on a large file with X.Org on Ubuntu Hoary (booted
> > from a live CD). It appears that the problem is still there, but to a
> > lesser extent
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 23:22 +0200, Gintautas Miliauskas wrote:
>
> I just tried gpdf on a large file with X.Org on Ubuntu Hoary (booted
> from a live CD). It appears that the problem is still there, but to a
> lesser extent. The PDF file that made XFree86 suck 200+ MB only
> expanded the X.Org
Hello.
I just want to add that the reported problem is not a generic debian
one. I have the same problem with an Intel 855GME chipset running Fedora
Core 3. Since this bugreport is the only reference I found on google I
want to add some notes here.
Running both the stable 6.8.1 and the developmen
Hello,
I just tried gpdf on a large file with X.Org on Ubuntu Hoary (booted
from a live CD). It appears that the problem is still there, but to a
lesser extent. The PDF file that made XFree86 suck 200+ MB only
expanded the X.Org server to 60-70MB. After a few minutes usage dropped
to 45MB. Whi
Hello,
I'm CCing my friend, Modestas Vainius, who told me about gpdf's uncanny
ability to make X eat lots of memory. Perhaps he could provide some
useful information.
> I'm sorry it has taken a little while to get back to you.
Oh, don't worry. I am very happy that you are helping me.
> Well,
11 matches
Mail list logo
