On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:06:18PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>
> If e2fsadm does not support LVM2, and 2.6 only supports LVM2, would it
> not be possible for e2fsadm to check for 2.6 and refuse to run? Giving
> me the help screen of a different command (lvmextend) is not quite
> helpfull righ
Hello,
sorry for the late reply, but I did not get your mail (it looks like
you did not CC: me, which is unfortunately necessary for the BTS).
I installed this machine under 2.4 and used LVM1 (manually created,
because d-i on ppc did not like to set it up, but formatting, mounting
etc went fine).
2 matches
Mail list logo
