Bug#285908: Please don't link evolution against ancient Kerberos libraries

2005-03-22 Thread Kaare Hviid
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 22:02 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > However, the package could build-depend on libkrb5-dev instead. Or, it > could drop the build-conflict and build-depend on heimdal-dev, but be fixed > to not enable support for the deprecated, never-standardized krb4 POP > protocol. Kerbe

Bug#285908: Please don't link evolution against ancient Kerberos libraries

2005-03-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:47:46AM +0100, Kaare Hviid wrote: > I'm sorry I didn't notice this earlier. One of the "non-standard > services" using Kerberos 4, is old legacy mail servers, in particular > at universities, which is probably why Ximian put it in Evolution in > the first place. I reall

Bug#285908: Please don't link evolution against ancient Kerberos libraries

2005-03-18 Thread Kaare Hviid
> Package: evolution > Version: 2.0.3-1 > Severity: important > > While looking for reverse-dependencies of the krb4 package to consider > whether it can be removed from testing to fix an RC bug, I found that the > evolution binaries on i386 are linked against libkrb5-17-heimdal and > libkrb-1-ker