Hi Jouni!
On Son, 03 Apr 2005, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> I ended up doing this a bit differently, i.e., without adding additional
> for loop and just using the previous for loop for both SSID is set and
Good. I thought about this, too, but then, without much insight into the
real working of the code
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:37:18PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Oh, thanks for this, but please take at least 10secs to check wether
> there are no other border cases. It *is* working in my setting, but I
> couldn't test it with other cases. I just checked the messages of
> wpa_supplicant -dd,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:37:18PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Concerning * vs something else: Does this mean we will have to add
> something like
> ssid="";
> or leave out the ssid entry completely?
Both alternatives would work.
--
Jouni Malinen
Dear Jouni!
On Mit, 30 Mär 2005, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> Thanks. However, * is a valid SSID, so I'm not going to accept it as a
> special wildcard for something like this. Trivial change would be to
> change the test to be ssid_len == 0.. I'll merge this into the
> wpa_supplicant development tree a
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 08:40:53AM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> SUCCESS!! Ok, at least for *me* it did work with the attached patch. I
> don't know when the other function is called, but I found the place
> where it is really usefull to add the patch.
Thanks. However, * is a valid SSID, so I'
On Mon, 21 Mär 2005, preining wrote:
> Ok, so it was too simple. Well, I will look into the code and see what
> has happened. The problem is that I don't have an AP around here to test
> it, grrr.
SUCCESS!! Ok, at least for *me* it did work with the attached patch. I
don't know when the other func
On Son, 20 Mär 2005, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> > If someone can confirm that this is working, I would be quite happy,
> > otherwise I am looking for a proper (i.e. not my stupid trial) fix!
>
> It looks a bit too simple I would say, and still with it applied I get:
> "No suitable AP found." for a
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:09:02PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> No Idea about it works or not (no wireless lan here in Uruguay), but I
> believe that from my trivial understanding of the code the following
> patch should do the trick, or am I wrong:
> --- wpa.c.orig2005-03-15 01:13:35.0
On Mit, 16 Mär 2005, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 06:45:38PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > I'm working on a patch for this, but have been exceedingly busy for this.
> >
> > Expect an upload soonish, hopefully.
>
> Terrific!
No Idea about it works or not (no wireless lan h
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 02:19:43PM +0100, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
> As a matter of fact I reported this feature lack as a wishlist bug to
> the debian bug tracking system when migrating from waproamd to
> wpasupplicant. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/287220 for that report.
>
> Unless I'm wron
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 06:20:34PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi all!
Cheers,
> How do I configure wpa_supplicant so that it automatically associates
> with an access point if no encryption is required, but the ap is not in
> the wpa_supplicant config file?
>
> Thanks a lot and all the be
11 matches
Mail list logo
