In the meantime, the subject was discussed in other threads on
debian-tetex-maint, and it seems that the way of doing things that was
being proposed should be safe. I've uploaded a package that only depends
on tex-common (a very small package) here:
deb http://people.debian.org/~frn/teTeX-3.0
[ Resending [EMAIL PROTECTED], which I only sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], by mistake. ]
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It shouldn't hurt. Why: Even without *anything* cionfigured calls to
mktexlsr and updmap-sys should work without any problem.
Maybe, but I'd like to be sure.
Hi Florent!
On Son, 09 Okt 2005, Florent Rougon wrote:
texmf.cnf file *is* generated. Then call the mktexlsr and updmap-sys
scripts only if they are existent.
Hmmm, I am still not sure it would be correct to call them without
having first ensured that tetex-bin (or its texlive equivalent)
Hi all!
On Sam, 08 Okt 2005, Florent Rougon wrote:
Well, easy but maybe not good enough: the need for the tetex-bin dep
arises from the calls to update-updmap, mktexlsr and updmap in postinst.
You could depend on tex-common for update-updmap. After this the
texmf.cnf file *is* generated. Then
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could depend on tex-common for update-updmap. After this the
Ups, I forgot update-updmap had migrated there! I must add this
dependency to the current packages for teTeX 3. Thanks for reminding me.
texmf.cnf file *is* generated. Then call the
Hi,
As you may know, I have a request (#290001) to drop lmodern's
dependencies on tetex-base and tetex-bin. With teTeX 3, this becomes
easy (I think), because /etc/texmf/updmap.d/10lmodern.cfg can be a
conffile.
Well, easy but maybe not good enough: the need for the tetex-bin dep
arises from the
6 matches
Mail list logo
