Bug#290329: uname -m not dpkg-architecture

2005-05-26 Thread allomber
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:58:38PM +0100, Alex Owen wrote: > > Just thinking some more about my proposed fix... using > dpkg-architecture would mean "Require: dpkg-dev" but the idea could > perhaps be reworked to use "uname -m" which is in coreutils which is: > > $ apt-cache show coreutils > Pack

Bug#290329: uname -m not dpkg-architecture

2005-05-26 Thread Alex Owen
Just thinking some more about my proposed fix... using dpkg-architecture would mean "Require: dpkg-dev" but the idea could perhaps be reworked to use "uname -m" which is in coreutils which is: $ apt-cache show coreutils Package: coreutils Essential: yes Priority: required Section: base . Not