> Do all classpath VMs have native code to load jar files? Does it make
> sense to distribute a jar instead?
Kissme doesn't. It delegates loading from JAR files to Java code, which
could be problematic during the boostrap sequence.
I've no problems with Classpath using ./configure parameters to
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 07:05, Michael Koch wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 07:45 schrieb jewel:
>
> Welcome back, John.
>
> > Do all classpath VMs have native code to load jar files? Does it
> > make sense to distribute a jar instead?
>
> The ones the don't have the code to load jars can inst
Am Montag, 17. Januar 2005 07:45 schrieb jewel:
Welcome back, John.
> Do all classpath VMs have native code to load jar files? Does it
> make sense to distribute a jar instead?
The ones the don't have the code to load jars can install classes
instead of glibj.zip.
A JAR is basically a ZIP. The
Do all classpath VMs have native code to load jar files? Does it make
sense to distribute a jar instead?
John Leuner
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 03:13, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Package: classpath-common
> Version: 2:0.13-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Hello !
>
> I was wondering why you don't pro
Package: classpath-common
Version: 2:0.13-3
Severity: wishlist
Hello !
I was wondering why you don't provide a jar archive ? It seems to me that it
is the standard way of
providing libraries in java - not all of the JVM recognise directly a zip
file...
Thanks for considering this !
5 matches
Mail list logo
