On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:58:46AM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 11:38 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:24:34PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > I'm adding some comments to the config file itself. Is some note in
> > > README.Debian necessary as well?
>
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 11:38 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:24:34PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I'm adding some comments to the config file itself. Is some note in
> > README.Debian necessary as well?
>
It might be appropriate to note on NEWS.Debian that the SPF facility
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:06:37PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:47:02PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Good reasons. Can you document these in README.Debian FAQ chapter,
> > like "why are you not using exim's built-in SPF interface?"
>
> Committed. Let me know what you t
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:47:02PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >
> > - Taking into account that I'm responsible for any mistakes in the config,
> > I want it to be simple and well-tested, and the spfquery method is the one
> > I'm best experienced with.
> >
> > - One of your concerns in RE
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:09:45PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 11:36:05AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Can't exim do SPF checks itself without having to revert to the
> > external spfquery utility? Or did you avoid this for a purpose, for
> > example to avoid a hard depend
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 11:38:55AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Is it possible to make the ACL entry a no-op if
> /usr/sbin/spfquery is not found on the system just for safety? A
> warning in that case would be nice.
Done now. Check commits r1517 and r1520 for the details.
--
Robert Millan
My sp
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 11:36:05AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> Thank you. I have given you commit privileges in Debian pkg-exim4 svn.
> Please write good changelog and commit log entries. I reserve the
> right to back out any changes ;)
>
> Since you have since then committed multiple changes to
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 11:38:55AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:24:34PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I'm adding some comments to the config file itself. Is some note in
> > README.Debian necessary as well?
>
> I don't think so. I'd write in the config file that
> libma
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:24:34PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> I'm adding some comments to the config file itself. Is some note in
> README.Debian necessary as well?
I don't think so. I'd write in the config file that
libmail-spf-query-perl needs to be installed for the ACL entry to
work. Is it
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> I just noticed you added me to the commiter list in the SVN.
Yes. I didn't mention that publicly earlier since privilege changes
take a while to propagate on alioth. And afterwards, answering your
message got lost in daily chaos.
>
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:12:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Deal! I'm attaching a patch to add a (disabled by default) SPF template in
> the debian config. I volunteer to do all the work that is derived from
> appliing
> this patch.
Thank you. I have given you commit privileges in Debian p
I just noticed you added me to the commiter list in the SVN. Given that I
resolved your style concerns with the previous patch, I'll assume this gives me
implicit permission to check it in (let me know if anything else needs tweaking
in that part).
As promised, I'll monitor pkg-exim4-maintainers
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 07:24:34PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Here's a new patch.
Actualy, please use this one instead. The former didn't authenticate mail from
"<>", where $sender_address is an empty string.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:28:45PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:12:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:30:12AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > I might consider including SPF if there is a volunteer co-maintainer
> > > who is willing to do _ALL_ sp
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:12:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:30:12AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > I might consider including SPF if there is a volunteer co-maintainer
> > who is willing to do _ALL_ spf-related support including bug triage,
> > upstream coordination, e
tags 290464 patch
thanks
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:30:12AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> I might consider including SPF if there is a volunteer co-maintainer
> who is willing to do _ALL_ spf-related support including bug triage,
> upstream coordination, end-user support so that my increase in wor
16 matches
Mail list logo
