Bug#290623: adduser should never use "nogroup" as a user's group

2022-07-13 Thread Marc Haber
Control: Severity -1 wishlist On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 05:27:29PM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote: > > > > In my opinion any package who wants to use an unprivileged user ("nouser") > > or > > group ("nogroup") should create a separate user

Bug#290623: adduser should never use nogroup as a user's group

2007-09-02 Thread Joerg Hoh
tags 290623 +wontfix thanks On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 11:56:31AM +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote: In my opinion any package who wants to use an unprivileged user (nouser) or group (nogroup) should create a separate user for that usage (see the www-data user for httpd). In any other way there maybe

Bug#290623: adduser should never use nogroup as a user's group

2007-06-25 Thread Joerg Hoh
On Samstag 15 Januar 2005, you wrote: Package: adduser Version: 3.59 Severity: normal adduser should never use nogroup as the group for a user by default. The reason nobody and nogroup exists is so that processes can be sure of having no special access to the file system. For this to work

Bug#290623: adduser should never use nogroup as a user's group

2005-01-15 Thread Roderick Schertler
Package: adduser Version: 3.59 Severity: normal adduser should never use nogroup as the group for a user by default. The reason nobody and nogroup exists is so that processes can be sure of having no special access to the file system. For this to work there musn't be anything in the file system