> "Hilmar" == Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hilmar> On 20.01.05 Prabhu Ramachandran ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hilmar> wrote: Hi,
>> dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
>>
Hilmar> The upstrean author meanwhile provided a patch for the
Hilmar>
On 20.01.05 Prabhu Ramachandran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
>
The upstrean author meanwhile provided a patch for the problem. I've
created a fixed binary sitting on [1] for i386. Would you be so kind
to download and test it, if you're s
forwarded 403245 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 403245 important
merge 403245 291438
stop
On 03.01.07 Mark A. Wicks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
sorry, my last mail was a typo.
> The patch I have incorporated is attached. It's similar to the
> Gentoo patch, but different in two ways:
>
>1)
wrote:
>
> >Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:48:17 +0100
> >From: Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Mark A. Wicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Bug#291438: tetex-bin: dvipdfm segfaults when used with
> >hyperref
> >and hyper
On 05.01.07 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> In short, check in, but do not upload. As I have done for texlive
>
As I don't know how to upload (I'm not a DD) I'll go ahead.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Hi Hilmar!
On Fre, 05 Jan 2007, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> build new tetex-bin packages soon and to check the patch into the
> SVN. I guess, if I check it into the trunk it won't automatically go
> into unstable or even testing, so it will be safe, right?
Well, from checking the stuff in not, but bu
On 04.01.07 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mit, 03 Jan 2007, Mark A. Wicks wrote:
Hi,
> > The patch I have incorporated is attached. It's similar to the
> > Gentoo
>
> Thanks a lot for the patch. I could apply the pdfdoc.c part without
> any problems to the texlive sources. Th
Hi Mark!
On Mit, 03 Jan 2007, Mark A. Wicks wrote:
> The patch I have incorporated is attached. It's similar to the Gentoo
Thanks a lot for the patch. I could apply the pdfdoc.c part without any
problems to the texlive sources. The configure part I simply dropped, I
guess this is not necessary
TECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#291438: tetex-bin: dvipdfm segfaults when used with hyperref
and hypertex
On 02.01.07 Mark A. Wicks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I am reserving some time tonight hopefully to finish this. I hope
to send a patch tomorrow.
I am sorry I didn&
On 02.01.07 Mark A. Wicks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> I am reserving some time tonight hopefully to finish this. I hope
> to send a patch tomorrow.
>
> I am sorry I didn't fix this ealier.
>
Good, to hear that. BTW we got that report another time on
http://bugs.debian.org/403245 . The sub
On 24.01.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Frank started using top posting and bottom quoting, I continue to do
so. This mail goes about http://bugs.debian.org/291438, which is
still not fixed in teTeX and now hits TeX Live too. As etch will be
released soon and is actually frozen: d
"Mark A. Wicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Prabhu has definitely uncovered a bug, but changing the length of the
> string isn't the right fix. That field should never be more than 24
> characters (including the terminating null character).
>
> I'm working on a fix. It looks like there's more t
Hello,
Unfortunately mails to -forwarded get archived, but are not
relayed to the list. Therefore I resend this for reference.
Frank
"Mark A. Wicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Prabhu has definitely uncovered a bug, but changing the length of the
> string isn't the right fix. That field sh
Prabhu Ramachandran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FK> The strange thing is that other people were not able to
> FK> reproduce the segfault with the same minimal LaTeX or dvi file
> FK> as Prabhu did. We would be glad if you could look into this.
>
> My wild guess is that this has someth
> "FK" == Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FK> Prabhu Ramachandran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, I've found the bug. Basically, the asn_date function in
>> texk/dvipdfm/pdfdoc.c was writing to a string but did not
>> allocate enough memory for the string before wri
Prabhu Ramachandran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I've found the bug. Basically, the asn_date function in
> texk/dvipdfm/pdfdoc.c was writing to a string but did not allocate
> enough memory for the string before writing to it. Attached is a
> trivial patch for the file texk/dvipdfm/pdfdoc.c.
> "FK" == Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FK> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uwe Steinmann) wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>>> Prabhu Ramachandran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.0.2-25 Severity: important
> "FK" == Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I will try it in a clean sarge environment soon.
>> No problems on sid (powerpc) with tetex-bin_2.0.2-26.
FK> I also did not get a segfault in my i386 sarge chroot. I'm
FK> helpless - how can one debug this? The only idea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uwe Steinmann) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Prabhu Ramachandran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Package: tetex-bin
>> > Version: 2.0.2-25
>> > Severity: important
>> >
>> > dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
>>
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Prabhu Ramachandran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: tetex-bin
> > Version: 2.0.2-25
> > Severity: important
> >
> > dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
> >
> > %
Prabhu Ramachandran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 2.0.2-25
> Severity: important
>
> dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
>
> %--
> % test.tex
> \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-25
Severity: important
dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
%--
% test.tex
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[hypertex]{hyperref}
\begin{document}
This is a simpl
22 matches
Mail list logo
