Hilmar == Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hilmar On 20.01.05 Prabhu Ramachandran ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hilmar wrote: Hi,
dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
Hilmar The upstrean author meanwhile provided a patch for the
Hilmar problem. I've
On 04.01.07 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mit, 03 Jan 2007, Mark A. Wicks wrote:
Hi,
The patch I have incorporated is attached. It's similar to the
Gentoo
Thanks a lot for the patch. I could apply the pdfdoc.c part without
any problems to the texlive sources. The
Hi Hilmar!
On Fre, 05 Jan 2007, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
build new tetex-bin packages soon and to check the patch into the
SVN. I guess, if I check it into the trunk it won't automatically go
into unstable or even testing, so it will be safe, right?
Well, from checking the stuff in not, but
On 05.01.07 Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
In short, check in, but do not upload. As I have done for texlive
As I don't know how to upload (I'm not a DD) I'll go ahead.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
]
To: Mark A. Wicks [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#291438: tetex-bin: dvipdfm segfaults when used with
hyperref
and hypertex
On 02.01.07 Mark A. Wicks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I am reserving some time tonight hopefully to finish this. I hope
to send a patch
forwarded 403245 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 403245 important
merge 403245 291438
stop
On 03.01.07 Mark A. Wicks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
sorry, my last mail was a typo.
The patch I have incorporated is attached. It's similar to the
Gentoo patch, but different in two ways:
1) It
On 20.01.05 Prabhu Ramachandran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
The upstrean author meanwhile provided a patch for the problem. I've
created a fixed binary sitting on [1] for i386. Would you be so kind
to download and test it, if you're
#291438: tetex-bin: dvipdfm segfaults when used with hyperref
and hypertex
On 02.01.07 Mark A. Wicks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I am reserving some time tonight hopefully to finish this. I hope
to send a patch tomorrow.
I am sorry I didn't fix this ealier.
Good, to hear that. BTW we got
Hi Mark!
On Mit, 03 Jan 2007, Mark A. Wicks wrote:
The patch I have incorporated is attached. It's similar to the Gentoo
Thanks a lot for the patch. I could apply the pdfdoc.c part without any
problems to the texlive sources. The configure part I simply dropped, I
guess this is not necessary
On 02.01.07 Mark A. Wicks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
I am reserving some time tonight hopefully to finish this. I hope
to send a patch tomorrow.
I am sorry I didn't fix this ealier.
Good, to hear that. BTW we got that report another time on
http://bugs.debian.org/403245 . The
On 24.01.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
Frank started using top posting and bottom quoting, I continue to do
so. This mail goes about http://bugs.debian.org/291438, which is
still not fixed in teTeX and now hits TeX Live too. As etch will be
released soon and is actually frozen:
Prabhu Ramachandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I've found the bug. Basically, the asn_date function in
texk/dvipdfm/pdfdoc.c was writing to a string but did not allocate
enough memory for the string before writing to it. Attached is a
trivial patch for the file texk/dvipdfm/pdfdoc.c.
FK == Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FK Prabhu Ramachandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I've found the bug. Basically, the asn_date function in
texk/dvipdfm/pdfdoc.c was writing to a string but did not
allocate enough memory for the string before writing to it.
Prabhu Ramachandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FK The strange thing is that other people were not able to
FK reproduce the segfault with the same minimal LaTeX or dvi file
FK as Prabhu did. We would be glad if you could look into this.
My wild guess is that this has something to do
Hello,
Unfortunately mails to bugnumber-forwarded get archived, but are not
relayed to the list. Therefore I resend this for reference.
Frank
Mark A. Wicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Prabhu has definitely uncovered a bug, but changing the length of the
string isn't the right fix. That
Mark A. Wicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prabhu has definitely uncovered a bug, but changing the length of the
string isn't the right fix. That field should never be more than 24
characters (including the terminating null character).
I'm working on a fix. It looks like there's more than one
FK == Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will try it in a clean sarge environment soon.
No problems on sid (powerpc) with tetex-bin_2.0.2-26.
FK I also did not get a segfault in my i386 sarge chroot. I'm
FK helpless - how can one debug this? The only idea I have, since
FK == Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FK [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uwe Steinmann) wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Prabhu Ramachandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-bin Version: 2.0.2-25 Severity: important
dvipdfm segfaults
Prabhu Ramachandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-25
Severity: important
dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
%--
% test.tex
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Prabhu Ramachandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-25
Severity: important
dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uwe Steinmann) wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Prabhu Ramachandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-25
Severity: important
dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
I will try it in a
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-25
Severity: important
dvipdfm segfaults on the following trivial LaTeX file.
%--
% test.tex
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[hypertex]{hyperref}
\begin{document}
This is a
22 matches
Mail list logo
