On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:45:24AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> type-handling already does all you ever want.
Except:
- its not in build-essential
- its not integrated into dpkg or the build system
So it may be fine, it doesn't actually do anything useful. If a
pre-existing program t
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:47:29PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >
> > Except you are also changing the syntax for the control file. That is
> > all I see as a negative for this.
>
> Well to fix this in a proper way we have to do _some_ changes, mine
> is the solution with less impact and minimal
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:08:58PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >
> > When Debian was only linux-gnu, one could check DEB_HOST_ARCH for "i386" to
> > do
> > something on i386 only. Currently, if you check DEB_*_ARCH for "i386"
> > you're
> > implicitly checking for linux-gnu. This is why Marc
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:50:17PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On another thread, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Could we automatically define some @linux@ or @any-i386@ variables the
> >> same way shlidbs or other substitutions work?
> >
> >
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:27:04PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:57:09PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > That's exactly what my patch tries to do, but extending the
> > recognised normal arches with some aliases that get expaned and
> > normalized to normal debian archtit
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On another thread, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Could we automatically define some @linux@ or @any-i386@ variables the
>> same way shlidbs or other substitutions work?
>
> That's exactly what my patch tries to do, but extending the
> recognised
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:57:09PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >
> > type-handling already does all you ever want.
>
> No, it does not. And as Robert has explained in another mail it
> needs hacks like an autogenerated control file, and use of self
> defined "aliases", etc.
Yeah, that's why I'
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:45:24AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The idea is to introduce architecture aliases, they will only take
> > effect on the source package and will get expanded when building
> > the binary package so there's not ne
8 matches
Mail list logo
