Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-02-12 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 03:30:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: > > On 2005-02-11 sean finney wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:15:55AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > > > FYI: new mysql FLOSS includes OpenSSL licen

Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-02-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:14:26AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 03:30:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: > > > On 2005-02-11 sean finney wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:15:55AM +0100

Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-02-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: > On 2005-02-11 sean finney wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:15:55AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > > FYI: new mysql FLOSS includes OpenSSL license, so many packages could > > > migrate to current libmysqlclient start

Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-02-12 Thread Paul Hampson
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:25:41PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:17:44AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:53:34AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > > > Nice, so we should check that any linked GPL library directly > > >

Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-02-13 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 12:07:06PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > So what if we had two editions of libmysqlclient, one of them > > ssl-enabled and the other - as currently - not? That would allow > > using ssl whenever possible. I think that could be done, without > > breaking things. > > That's

Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-02-11 Thread sean finney
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:15:55AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > FYI: new mysql FLOSS includes OpenSSL license, so many packages could > migrate to current libmysqlclient starting from no starting from now.. that's great to hear! i'm cc'ing the relevant wishlist bug i have open against m

Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-02-11 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello On 2005-02-11 sean finney wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:15:55AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > FYI: new mysql FLOSS includes OpenSSL license, so many packages could > > migrate to current libmysqlclient starting from no starting from now.. > > that's great to hear! i'm cc'i

Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-02-12 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 12:39:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Nice, so we should check that any linked GPL library directly (obviuolsy) or > > indirectly (with N=1,2,3... levels of indirection) linked against > > openssl adds the exception. > > No, we should simply not be linking libmysql

Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-02-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:53:34AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > Nice, so we should check that any linked GPL library directly (obviuolsy) > > > or > > > indirectly (with N=1,2,3... levels of indirection) linked against > > > openssl adds the exception. > > No, we should simply no

Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-02-12 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:17:44AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:53:34AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > > Nice, so we should check that any linked GPL library directly > > > > (obviuolsy) or > > > > indirectly (with N=1,2,3... levels of indirection) linke