retitle 293261 wnpp bugs should also be against the package itself
thanks
Hello people,
Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:27:49 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
I think it would be sufficient to add header information to the
package's bug page:
Debian Bug report logs: package saods9
Maintainer for saods9 is
Okay, I have reassined to b.d.o, if for no other reason, to see if a
fix is easier, or people there are more willing to implement it.
--
Clear skies,
Justin
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:08:17AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
retitle 293261 wnpp bugs should also be against the package itself
On Thursday 03 February 2005 21:53, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Say you find a bug in a package what do you do?
You check bugs.debian.org for that package (probably through
reportbug).
If that list shows you that the package is orphaned or up for adoption
you, as DD actively using that
What I mean is that those bugs should be reassigned to
wnpp,package so they show up in the wnpp and the packages bug log.
Wouldn't it be easier/cleaner to modify debbugs to show an additional
category WNPP?
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description:
Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouldn't it be easier/cleaner to modify debbugs to show an additional
category WNPP?
Well, after a bit reflection, I think I'm against. Firstmost, because
already now a lot of people don't seem to be able to get wnpp bugs
right. Secondly, it
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
it would be nice if bugs against wnpp that concern actual debian
packages, i.e. [O] and [RFA], would also be against the package
itself.
What I mean is that those bugs should be reassigned to
wnpp,package so they show up in the wnpp and the packages
6 matches
Mail list logo
