On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 07:17:26PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 05:09:01PM +0100, Malte Schmidt-Tychsen wrote:
> > Did ya get it?
>
> yes, thanks :) sorry I'm just a little busy, I'll try to look into your
> logs this weekend.
>
> From a quick look cpufreqd seems to try
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 05:09:01PM +0100, Malte Schmidt-Tychsen wrote:
> Did ya get it?
yes, thanks :) sorry I'm just a little busy, I'll try to look into your
logs this weekend.
>From a quick look cpufreqd seems to try to do the right thing, so I'm
wondering if echoing 90%100%performance or 78%
Did ya get it?
Hi Mattia,
>Ooops, your SMTP bounces messages from my address... hope you'll readthe
>bug tracking system
Sorry about the bounce. GMX is the largest freemail provider in Germany.
1GB for free and all. Dunno why this hap
Ooops, your SMTP bounces messages from my address... hope you'll readthe
bug tracking system
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:15:50AM +0100, Malte Schmidt-Tychsen wrote:
> Package: cpufreqd
> Version: 1.2.2-2
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> I have an IBM Thinkpad A20m laptop computer.
tags 294343 + moreinfo
thank
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 11:15:50AM +0100, Malte Schmidt-Tychsen wrote:
[...]
> With the current setup and different settings in cpufreqd.conf (pm is
> always set to apm in there) cpufreqd doesn't change the frequency on a
> running machine at all. On startup it eit
Package: cpufreqd
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: important
Hi,
I have an IBM Thinkpad A20m laptop computer.
I am running Debian Sarge upgraded to the latest and greatest with a
2.4.26 kernel. I patched this kernel with wlan-ng and cpufreq patches. The
cpufreq patches are from 12-200
6 matches
Mail list logo
