> Having looked into this a little more, I now think that simple
> misunderstanding may be why this turned into a major debate. The
> original wishlist said something like, "please have dpkg follow
> policy." Of course, what Thomas meant was, "please copy the style
> mentioned in policy for some
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 06:15:34PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Chris Waters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I could say I want guidance from policy on what color of shirt I wear
> > to my next LUG meeting. That doesn't mean it's a matter for policy.
> Well, I'm not sure that irony is the
Quoting Chris Waters ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:20:19AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > No shenanigans here. The dpkg maintainer says that he wants guidance
> > from policy.
>
> I could say I want guidance from policy on what color of shirt I wear
> to my next LUG me
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, wrote:
> I have no intention of using policy to "beat anyone on the head".
> To repeat, the dpkg maintainer _asked_ for policy guidance. That is
> why he reassigned #254998 to debian-policy. You reassigned it back
> to dpkg on the grounds that there was no "bug" in policy.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:20:19AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No shenanigans here. The dpkg maintainer says that he wants guidance
> from policy.
I could say I want guidance from policy on what color of shirt I wear
to my next LUG meeting. That doesn't mean it's a matter for policy.
> H
> Fuck no. You are the one who resorted to bureaucratic
> shennaigans to convince dpkg maintainers to change the way it works,
> rather than trying and convince them that your way is right.
No shenanigans here. The dpkg maintainer says that he wants guidance
from policy. He wrote:
Ac
6 matches
Mail list logo
