Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-04-15 Thread Matt Brown
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 17:45 +1100, Adam Conrad wrote: > Hrm, on my system, I got the segv even with a more minmal config (I can > remove the vhost, log_module, and dir_module, and it still dies). Interesting, I definitely need those directives in the config file to cause a segfault. > If I rever

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-03-25 Thread Adam Conrad
Matt Brown said: > > - Uncomment mod_ssl and the segfault vanishes > - Comment either of the modules in php.in and the segfault vanishes > - Remove virtual host and the segfault vanishes > - Remove config_log_module or dir_module and the segfault vanishes Hrm, on my system, I got the segv even wit

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-02-09 Thread Matt Brown
Package: php4-pgsql Version: 3:4.3.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing php4-pgsql restarting apache results in a segfault and apache does not start. Removing the line extension=pgsql.so from /etc/php4/apache/php.ini and restarting apache results in apac

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-02-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:14:23PM +1300, Matt Brown wrote: > Package: php4-pgsql > Version: 3:4.3.9-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > After installing php4-pgsql restarting apache results in a segfault and > apache does not start. > Removing the line > extension=pg

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-02-09 Thread Matt Brown
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 21:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Please upgrade to a current version of libpq3 and let me know if this > segfault goes away. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -s libpq3 Package: libpq3 Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: libs Installed-Size: 324 Maintainer:

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-02-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:21:54PM +1300, Matt Brown wrote: > On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 21:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Please upgrade to a current version of libpq3 and let me know if this > > segfault goes away. > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -s libpq3 > Package: libpq3 > Status: install ok ins

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-02-09 Thread Matt Brown
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 21:27 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > extension=mysql.so > > extension=domxml.so > > extension=imap.so > > extension=ldap.so > > extension=pgsql.so > > Does apache similarly start successfully if you remove imap.so from the > list of loaded extensions? Apache does indeed s

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-02-09 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 294501 php4-imap thanks On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:44:36PM +1300, Matt Brown wrote: > On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 21:27 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > extension=mysql.so > > > extension=domxml.so > > > extension=imap.so > > > extension=ldap.so > > > extension=pgsql.so > > Does apache simi

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-02-10 Thread Matt Brown
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 23:36 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Yes indeed, since php4-imap is the traditional home for this particular > bug, I'm reassigning. > > Can you send version/dependency information for the php4-imap package > you have installed, and if appropriate, upgrade those packages as

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-03-03 Thread Steve Langasek
Matt, On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:18:07PM +1300, Matt Brown wrote: > I just apt-get dist-upgrade'd my system, and symptoms are still exactly > the same. > I've included versions of the dependencies listed above for your > reference I think Adam sent this follow-up to the wrong address: > Hrm.

Bug#294501: php4-pgsql: php4-psql causes apache to segfault upon startup

2005-03-04 Thread Matt Brown
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 21:34 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > I think Adam sent this follow-up to the wrong address: No, I did receive it, but I've been busy trying to get one of my applications ready to be sponsored as a new Debian package... anyway thanks for the subtle nudge, the requested inform