On Feb 14, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> current status, I plainly believe that /etc/init.d/$foo stop;
> /etc/init.d/$foo start should just work.
I don't think that this is important, nor I think that it can be
implemented in a general and robust way, but feel free to send a patch
whi
reopen 294843
severity important
thanks
Hi,
please let me explain why I'm reopening this bug. First of all, Marco,
thanks for uploading a new version of the package that makes the
probability of this happening lower. I am still very unhappy with the
current status, I plainly believe that /etc/i
reopen 294843
thanks
Hi Marco,
On Friday, 11 Feb 2005, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We just discussed this.
> Either send a patch or learn to deal with it.
sorry, but i consider this as not Policy conform and thus it is RC.
Greetings
Martin
--
Before I knew the best
Package: udev
Severity: serious
Justification: Debian Policy 9.3.2
Hi Marco,
Policy say at 9.3.2
These scripts should be named /etc/init.d/package, and they should
accept one argument, saying what to do:
start
start the service,
stop
stop the service,
02/11/05 [21:57:36] < zobel>
4 matches
Mail list logo