clone 295060 -1
retitle -1 Should work with symlinks in /etc/wwwoffle, and respect file removals
severity -1 important
thanks
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, David Schmitt wrote:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3 says:
local changes
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did actually. I would have expected an email, or at least a message to
d-devel-announce with a list of removed packages. That sucks.
Thanks for bringing it to my attention!
I have already complained about the procedure on -devel, I suggested to
send a
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
Hi *!
The easier part of this problem is addressed by the attached patch:
wwwoffle.config tries to preseed the
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The overwwrites local config part is way harder. Looking at the postinst
gives me the creeps.
I've found one more. This script would be much better readable if it
wouldn't use the same code over and over, without any shell function -
I found at least
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
In the elif line, this must be $USE_PPP, of course.
Good one.
This looks like it may be _the_ bug...
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
I'm a bit busy with all sorts of things (e.g. new upstream rsync this
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 18:34, Frank Küster wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back into sarge.
Indeed. Great. Thanks!
The overwwrites local config part is way
(Please note that I didn't read mail while I wrote some to this bug, and
now I'm starting to answer from the first mail I got. No offense
intended, but I might not yet know some things you said in later
mails).
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:21, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following code is AFAICS not conditional upon first installation,
thus overriding a local admin who has intentionally removed the link.
Line 257:
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, David Schmitt wrote:
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:21, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following code is AFAICS not conditional upon first installation,
thus overriding a local admin who has
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue 05 Apr 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
David Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking into this, trying to provide a patch - and NMU if Paul
doesn't show up, I really think wwwoffle should go back
Hi *!
The easier part of this problem is addressed by the attached patch:
wwwoffle.config tries to preseed the debconf db with yes/no for boolean values
which expect true/false.
The overwwrites local config part is way harder. Looking at the postinst
gives me the creeps. Just a few quotes which
Hi *!
[Pressed send to early :( there was a final thing]
Line 523++:
| chmod 0640 ${CONFIG}*; chown proxy:proxy ${CONFIG}*
[...]
| chown proxy /etc/wwwoffle
| chmod u+w /etc/wwwoffle
I don't know how this should be handled, but it smells too.
Upon fixing those things, one probably should
13 matches
Mail list logo
