Bug#295166: Partitioner bug

2005-02-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 11:23:52PM +0100, Kero-Chan wrote: >> :( >> Well. I know I'm saying it for the second time, but: >> This is not x86 BIOS/Boot-loader stuff. Slackware 10.1 works on the >> same box (with LILO and GRUB too). >> This is Debian specific

Bug#295166: Partitioner bug

2005-02-25 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 11:23:52PM +0100, Kero-Chan wrote: > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:35:57 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The stuff you are speaking which is not working, is it using lvm or not. > > > > Someone else should preferably step in here, as x86 bios and boot-loader > >

Bug#295166: Partitioner bug

2005-02-22 Thread Kero-Chan
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:35:57 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The stuff you are speaking which is not working, is it using lvm or not. > > Someone else should preferably step in here, as x86 bios and boot-loader stuff > rather bores me. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther :( Well. I kn

Bug#295166: Partitioner bug

2005-02-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 02:21:50PM +0100, Kero-Chan wrote: > Well, as I said, if I don't modify the setup, but just select "Erase > entire harddrive" to let it set up partitions automatically and then > "Finish partitioning", Everything works!! > It installs GRUB, which can then boot Linux! (I'm po

Bug#295166: Partitioner bug

2005-02-16 Thread Kero-Chan
Well, as I said, if I don't modify the setup, but just select "Erase entire harddrive" to let it set up partitions automatically and then "Finish partitioning", Everything works!! It installs GRUB, which can then boot Linux! (I'm posting from such a setup.) The automatic setup is: 20G /, first pri

Bug#295166: Partitioner bug

2005-02-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Kero-Chan wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:12:47 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Then I tried with this setup: > > > 20G /, First primary partition, Ext3, boot-flag on > > > 384M swap, Second primary partition > > > NB: This is the partit

Bug#295166: Partitioner bug

2005-02-16 Thread Kero-Chan
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:12:47 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:01:22AM +0100, Kero-Chan wrote: > > Package: installation-reports > > > > INSTALL REPORT > > > > Debian-installer-version: Sarge-RC2 > > uname -a: Install failed > > Date: - > > Method: Boot from

Bug#295166: Partitioner bug

2005-02-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 05:01:22AM +0100, Kero-Chan wrote: > Package: installation-reports > > INSTALL REPORT > > Debian-installer-version: Sarge-RC2 > uname -a: Install failed > Date: - > Method: Boot from Sarge-RC2 NetInstall CD > > Machine: - > Processor: Intel Pentium III 733MHz > Memory: 51

Bug#295166: Partitioner bug

2005-02-13 Thread Kero-Chan
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Sarge-RC2 uname -a: Install failed Date: - Method: Boot from Sarge-RC2 NetInstall CD Machine: - Processor: Intel Pentium III 733MHz Memory: 512MB Root Device: IDE, Quantum Fireball+ 20G Root Size/partition table: See below O