That seems mighty fine to me. Does anyone object?
Also, is there somewhere this new feature should be documented?
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:11:54PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.77
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> I just packaged kernel-patch-suspend2
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.77
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I just packaged kernel-patch-suspend2, which uses
/etc/mkinitrd/scripts. The problem is that any script in that
directory are run for all kernel versions, even if not applicable.
My suggestion is to use the same approach as kern
also sprach Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.05.1239 +0100]:
> Sounds reasonable to me. I have one questions about the resulting
> initrd. How does mkinitrd make sure (or not) that the programs
> called in the scripts are (or not) included in the initrd, and
> what about the libraries used
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:11:54PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: initrd-tools
> Version: 0.1.77
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> I just packaged kernel-patch-suspend2, which uses
> /etc/mkinitrd/scripts. The problem is that any script in that
> directory are run for all kernel ver
4 matches
Mail list logo