Bug#298120: allow per-version scripts

2005-03-15 Thread Horms
That seems mighty fine to me. Does anyone object? Also, is there somewhere this new feature should be documented? On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:11:54PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Package: initrd-tools > Version: 0.1.77 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > I just packaged kernel-patch-suspend2

Bug#298120: allow per-version scripts

2005-03-04 Thread martin f krafft
Package: initrd-tools Version: 0.1.77 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch I just packaged kernel-patch-suspend2, which uses /etc/mkinitrd/scripts. The problem is that any script in that directory are run for all kernel versions, even if not applicable. My suggestion is to use the same approach as kern

Bug#298120: allow per-version scripts

2005-03-05 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.05.1239 +0100]: > Sounds reasonable to me. I have one questions about the resulting > initrd. How does mkinitrd make sure (or not) that the programs > called in the scripts are (or not) included in the initrd, and > what about the libraries used

Bug#298120: allow per-version scripts

2005-03-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 10:11:54PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Package: initrd-tools > Version: 0.1.77 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > I just packaged kernel-patch-suspend2, which uses > /etc/mkinitrd/scripts. The problem is that any script in that > directory are run for all kernel ver