On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:02:05AM +0200, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: normal
Hello, I'm preparing the updated mozilla-firefox-locale-all package,
with 1.0.1 translations.
In some of these mozilla.org translations,
El Jueves 10 Marzo 2005 14:54 escribiste:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:02:05AM +0200, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: normal
Hello, I'm preparing the updated mozilla-firefox-locale-all package,
with 1.0.1
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:07:25PM +0200, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo
I'm not an XML expert, so I was reading yesterday the XML
specification before reporting the bug, and it was not clear for me if
blank space matters.
(FYI)
It's actually clearer when you look at the formal definitions:
El Jueves 10 Marzo 2005 19:22 escribiste:
It's actually clearer when you look at the formal definitions:
document ::= prolog element Misc* [1]
prolog ::= XMLDecl? Misc* (doctypedecl Misc*)? [2]
XMLDecl ::= '?xml' VersionInfo EncodingDecl? SDDecl? S? '?' [3]
Misc ::= Comment | PI | S [4]
S
forwarded 298796 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285613
tag 298796 + patch
thanks
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 07:32:05PM +0200, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
El Jueves 10 Marzo 2005 19:22 escribiste:
It's actually clearer when you look at the formal definitions:
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: normal
Hello, I'm preparing the updated mozilla-firefox-locale-all package,
with 1.0.1 translations.
In some of these mozilla.org translations, the fist line of install.rdf
is a blank line, and then ?xml version=1.0? is in the second line.
In
6 matches
Mail list logo
